|Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Maddox conducted a follow up complaint inspection and met with Director, Ms. Kim. The purpose of the inspection was to deliver the findings of the above complaint allegation. During the course of investigating the above complaint allegation. LPA interviewed staff, parents from the roster, and complainant before concluding this investigation. From interviews and information gathered, Staff person #1 continued to show behavior that threatened the personal rights of children and staff present which resulted in her termination. It was the decision of Staff person #1 to disenroll her children not the center. Staff person stated she didn't feel her children would be in a safe environment. |
*â€œAs of January 1, 2017, the term â€œinconclusiveâ€ is no longer used to refer to the outcome of certain complaint investigations. Such complaint allegations are now deemed â€œunsubstantiated.â€ This document has not yet been updated to reflect this change and for purposes of this complaint investigation the Departmentâ€™s finding is that this allegation was unsubstantiated. â€œ Based upon the weight of evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to establish or disprove the allegation actually occurred. Therefore, the investigative finding have been rendered "Unsubstantiated".